Index, Table Of Contents, About Page

▼

What Really Happened At #3 Fukushima Reactor And Spent Fuel Pool #3? Multiple Nuclear Experts Interviewed; 3 Different Explosions, And Huge Black, Purple Mushroom Nuclear Explosion Cloud, Which Cannot Possibly Be A Hydrogen Explosion

What Really Happened At #3 Fukushima Reactor And Spent Fuel Pool #3? Multiple Nuclear Experts Interviewed; 3 Different Explosions, And Huge Black, Purple Mushroom Nuclear Explosion Cloud, Which Cannot Possibly Be A Hydrogen Explosion

The 'official' pro nuclear industry version of events surrounding the Fukushima disaster, makes it sound like Fukushima was just a minor event with radiation releases that total no more than 10% of Chernobyl, and that no one died, no one will die due to the very low amount of radiation released. The 'official' story is that the #3 building explosion was a pure hydrogen explosion like all of the rest of the buildings, and nothing radioactive got out of containment. In addition, the official story is that no spent fuel pools or equipment pools caught on fire or melted out. That is the 'official' mantra repeated by just anyone inside of the closed nuclear club.




Worst Case Scenario Around The Fukushima Mega Nuclear Disaster Based On Actual Data And Evidence, Vs Best Case Computer Estimates Presented By Nuclear Industry But Without Evidence Or Real Data
https://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2015/10/worst-case-scenario-around-fukushima.html

Multiple Fukushima Spent Fuel Pools Burned And Vaporized, Plutonium MOX Fuel Vaporized And Traveled All Around The World On Jet Stream, Arnie Gunderson Proves Fuel Rods Catch On Fire

WHO IS GULLIBLE? WHO WILL FALL FOR AND BELIEVE EVERYTHING THAT A CORRUPT CORPORATION AND GOVERNMENT SAYS?


The pro nuclear industry 'experts' official story and claims of nothing happening, no fuel leaving the buildings and no fuel pools melting or burning do not match the scientific evidence in any way. And that creates a problem, because science is about evidence, not about empty claims and positive PR spin, plus computer models/estimates that do not match reality at all.  

Is there any evidence that a very massive amount of radiation was released by the Fukushima mega nuclear disaster, which is contrary to the claim that Fukushima is only a 1 to 10% of Chernobyl event? Let's dive in..... if you dare to look at the censored and covered up truth. A good overview of the whole event is available at the following link, but this article will focus only on what happened at building number 3. 

Total Fukushima Radiation Released Into Ocean, Air, Groundwater, Storage Tanks, etc
https://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2012/02/total-fukushima-radiation-released-into.html

EVIDENCE; NEW 2015 ANALYSIS BY JAPAN ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY SHOWS UNIT 3 RELEASED MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF MOX FUEL FALLOUT TO THE NORTHWEST MARCH 15TH


PTOctober 24, 2015 New Analysis Shows Fukushima Unit 3 Released High Concentration Of Contamination October 23rd, 2015
“Yomiuri Shimbun is reporting a new analysis by Japan Atomic Energy Agency that shows Fukushima unit 3 may have released a high concentration of contamination northwest of the plant. Their analysis assumed that the release happened late in the evening of March 15, 2011 to early morning March 16th. Yomiuri reports that JAEA assumes a venting could have caused the release, but the last venting publicly documented by TEPCO was on 10:15pm March 14th. If JAEA’s time estimate is correct it is also roughly 12 hours after the unit 3 explosion...”

NUCLEAR REACTOR DESIGNER SAYS BUILDING #3 EXPLOSION WAS A NUCLEAR CRITICALITY EXPLOSION, AND THAT EXPLOSION RELEASED TONS OF HIGHLY RADIOACTIVE MOX FUEL INTO ATMOSPHERE AND OCEAN


‘I watched video of the Reactor 3 explosion,’ said veteran Japanese nuclear-reactor designer Setsuo Fujiwara. ‘There was an orange flash, which suggests the temperature must have been thousands of degrees centigrade before the explosion. Then there was black smoke.’ Fujiwara insisted to me that a hydrogen explosion created white smoke and steam, as witnessed after the Reactor 1 building was torn apart. 

 He continued, ‘The second piece of evidence is that plutonium was scattered about after this blast. Plutonium is consistent with the mixed oxide fuel [used in Reactor 3]. 

 The third point is that the Reactor 3 building was bent like candy, unlike the Reactor 1 building, where the steel framework remained intact. So this could only mean it was a nuclear explosion.’
http://enenews.com/reactor-designer-it-was-a-nuclear-explosion-at-fukushima-unit-3-plutonium-was-scattered-after-blast-abc-theres-willful-denial-and-lying-going-on-here-even-at-the-highest-levels (website deleted)

NHK admitted pieces of fuel rods and reactor vessels blasted to at least Ibaraki to contain Uranium and; Zirconium
http://fukushima-diary.com/2014/08/nhk-admitted-pieces-fuel-rods-reactor-vessels-blasted-least-ibaraki-contain-uranium-zirconium/(website deleted)

Cover-up of massive explosion at Fukushima Reactor 3 fueled with plutonium? US government’s “worst case” scenario likely a reality… entire nuclear core ejected into environment — Experts: It seems blast wasn’t from only hydrogen — “Ejection of fuel parts… Exploding vortices suggest a steam explosion”
http://enenews.com/cover-massive-explosion-fukushima-reactor-3-fueled-plutonium-governments-worst-case-scenario-reality-experts-blast-wasnt-only-hydrogen-ejection-fuel-parts-exploding-vortices-suggest-steam-explos/ (website deleted)

THREE EXPLOSIONS AT REACTOR 3 IN RAPID SUCCESSION? MASS MEDIA CLAIMS THAT THERE IS JUST ONE HYDROGEN GAS EXPLOSION, NO RADIATION RELEASE


Hippie Dog MAY 3, 2017  Yep in reality there were 3 explosions at reactor 3 in rapid succession…

The initial breach where you can see the fireball coming out the side of the reactor lid and passing out of the building, a compression explosion. Next the core reacted to the sudden change in pressures between the outer containment and it's containment, blew out the control rod section located at the bottom of the core and went up like a a roman candle. The third boom was from the core going through the lid and concrete plug.

That's 3 explosion events in just a few seconds…

Here's the video again, you can clearly hear all three separate explosions…

Fukushima Daiichi Reactor 3 Explosion
VIDEO:  https://youtu.be/pYgTI52ZApo  3 min

Photos of the core outside: http://lamarsworldmall.com/weather/fuku/reactor3/

Now we are getting to the actual events themselves, not what some PR guy said…"

Down The River MAY 3, 2017 Every time I watch that video Hippie Dog and see all the HUGE pieces of smoking/burning shit falling out of that cloud, I think “fuck us”. You can tell how big those pieces are by comparing them to the vent stacks......

Reactor 3 Explosion - Fukushima Meltdown Japan March 14 2011

A Hydrogen gas explosion is WHITE SMOKE. Any chemist student knows this. What happened at unit number 3 was not a hydrogen explosion. It was a dirty bomb nuclear explosion, that the nuclear industry calls an 'excursion'. 

But that can never be revealed to the public, because nuclear reactors cannot explode, according to the nuclear industry. 

Here is what a hydrogen gas explosion or burning looks like.... 



VIRTUAL REALITY TOUR OF BUILDING NUMBER 3 BEFORE IT EXPLODED

Virtual reality tour of typical Fukushima reactor building
Video; https://youtu.be/P62QwJ2A19s 2 min.

EVIDENCE: PEAK OCEAN READINGS AFTER 2,400 OPEN AIR NUCLEAR BOMB EXPLOSIONS, CHERNOBYL AND THEN FUKUSHIMA MEGA NUCLEAR DISASTER

Is there an overview of the Fukushima disaster, which compares it in one picture, to other nuclear disasters and to 2,400 open air nuclear bomb tests? 

The answer is YES! The same scientists who tracked and measured ocean radiation provide the evidence.... Take a look at the picture below and what do you see as far as peak ocean readings? Of course, they don't show you the absolute highest peak reading after Fukushima, which was actually 180,000,000 Bq, not 100 million.


Event                                                Peak Radiation Reading In Bq/m³

 2,400 Nuclear weapons testing peak -                  75 Bq/m³
Chernobyl caused a peak reading of -             5,000 Bq/m³
Fukushima caused a peak reading of - 100,000,000 Bq/m³

CONCLUSION

Setting off 2,400 atomic bombs made everything/everyone radioactive, including the oceans.. It was a global nuclear war, which continues today with DU weapons.

More details are available at;

 Fukushima Ocean Radiation Compared To Chernobyl and 2,400 Open Air Nuclear Bomb Tests
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/05/fukushima-radiation-measured-in-pacific.html

What would cause this massive spike in peak ocean radiation levels? Where is the evidence of this massive radiation release? First let's dive into Chernobyl, which was also and still is the target of a huge nuclear industry cover up, minimization and denial campaign.

CHERNOBYL RELEASED 50 TONS OF URANIUM, AND RESULTED IN 69 MILLION VICTIMS, ACCORDING TO MEDICAL DOCTOR RESEARCH GROUP IPPNW


Chernobyl released 50 tons of uranium and 500 tons of radioactive graphite into the air, according to the following documentary movie about it. 

Movie Review; Zero Hour: Disaster at Chernobyl - Discovery Channel (2004) via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/06/zero-hour-disaster-at-chernobyl.html

How many people died because of Chernobyl? The nuclear club says almost no one, but they don't rely on evidence. Instead, they use fancy computer models, statistics and fancy math that does not add up when the epidemiology studies are done and the actual evidence on the ground is looked at by anyone other than the insiders who are all pro nuclear. 

Chernobyl Coverup And Denial Of 1 Million Casualties
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/03/chernobyl-coverup-and-denial-of-1.html

IPPNW - Global Health Effects And Number Of Deaths Caused By Chernobyl Nuclear Planet Meltdown - 69 Million Victims
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/07/ippnw-health-effects-of-chernobyl-25.html

PRO NUCLEAR APOLOGISTS CLAIM FUKUSHIMA WAS ONLY 1 - 10% OF CHERNOBYL; DO YOU BELIEVE THEM, KNOWING THAT AT LEAST THREE NUCLEAR REACTORS WITH 100 TONS OF FUEL EACH MELTED DOWN AND OUT AT FUKUSHIMA, OR MORE?

Looking back at how Chernobyl and TMI were covered up and victims were blamed instead of the radiation, it is easy to see how that same denial of anything bad happening came to be applied to Fukushima.

The pro nuclear 'experts' claim that at Fukushima, no spent fuel pool fires happened, only hydrogen explosions happened, no spent fuel pool melt outs happened, no plutonium was released, no reactor containment was breached, and that the entire Fukushima site is now in cold shutdown. As a result of this non event, a normal 'decommissioning' is going on. (This artificially computer constructed theory has many holes, as you will discover in this article.. Some truth tellers are needed to adjust the nuclear industry of events on the Wikipedia page by the way.

The above Wiki article should be considered the ‘official’ TEPCO press release version of events because the nuclear industry seems to have plenty of time and money on their hands to write up fictional accounts on Wikipedia.

With Chernobyl releasing 50 tons of uranium from a single reactor and no spent fuel pool, how many tons of uranium and plutonium do you think came out of Fukushima, from all of its 6 reactors and 7 spent fuel pools, in addition to other nuclear plants around Japan also having problems and not being able to cool their reactors and spent fuel pools after the tsunami, such as at the Daini facility, which was right down the road from Daichi? 

Many Nuclear Power Plants In Japan Were Damaged And/Or Melted Down After 3/11 9.0 Earthquake, Not Just 3 At Fukushima Daichi
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/03/14-nuclear-reactors-at-4-japan-sites.html

FORMER SENIOR REACTOR OPERATOR AND ENGINEER SAYS COLD SHUTDOWN A MYTH, COOLING IS A MYTH, CLEANUP IS A MYTH, CONTAINMENT IS A MYTH, DECOMMISSIONING IS A MYTH, EMERGENCY PLANNING IS A MYTH


Nuclear Engineer: I agree Fukushima can be ‘extinction event’; It’s a myth that disaster is being contained — Nuclear Expert: Radioactive material has “contaminated much of Pacific Coast of North America… Negative impacts of the accident have spread throughout world” (VIDEO)
Chris Harris, former licensed Senior Reactor Operator & engineer, Apr 23, 2015, starting at 15:15 in (emphasis added):
Question: “Do you agree that this is, essentially — if it runs the next 20 years without anything happening — basically an extinction event for a good part of the human race and higher life forms?”
Chris Harris, former licensed Senior Reactor Operator and engineer: “I just jotted down some thoughts really quickly, these are myths of Fukushima: Containment – there isn’t any, even though today they started off probably another failed attempt at the ice walls;Cold shutdown is a myth at Fukushima — they declared it, but there is no cold shut down there; Cooling is a myth there, because you can’t tell that there is actual cooling going to where ever the fuel is; Waste processing… mountains of plastic bags, a mountain of them — that’s waste processing?; Decommissioning is a myth; Cleanup is a myth, it’s a waste generation facility; … There is no containment; Emergency planning there is also a myth, as we have seen because of the faulty electrical systems and everything else from the makeshift system they do have running. So, I am in agreement with your statement.“

MONOPOLISTIC AND CORRUPT NUCLEAR INDUSTRY SURVIVAL AND PRO NUCLEAR APOLOGISTS PAYCHECKS DEPEND ON THEM NOT FINDING OUT OR TELLING THE TRUTH


When your paycheck depends on the public not knowing the truth and protecting a highly vulnerable industry, it is very difficult, almost impossible, to find out what really happened. Find out more about how the large corporate monopolies are corrupt and deceptive, click on the following link....

Art And Science Of Deception And Corruption; Global Corporations And The 1%
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/corporations-art-and-science-of.html

Let’s explore what really may have happened, since every time TEPCO says something, they seem to have to take it back or change it radically to something completely different at some point in the future. When someone tells the truth, the story does not keep changing. When someone lies, the story has to keep changing, because the truth keeps being discovered, so new lies have to be made up..

AGRP and much of the public agrees, that they have never seen so many stories and news reports and official numbers change so often, from a supposedly professional organization made up of nuclear experts. In a court of law, if someone is caught in a lie once, their entire testimony can be thrown out. TEPCO has been caught in so many lies, many people now consider them and the associated nuclear entities to be entirely unbelievable, no matter what they say, it is that bad.

NUCLEAR INDUSTRY IS KNOWN FOR CORRUPTION, DECEPTION AND COVER UPS; JUST HOW BAD IS IT?


It has gotten so bad, that even the mayors in Fukushima are refusing to meet with the government officials in charge of this accident due to mistrust of the the government, which represents the nuclear industry, but not the people affected by this mega nuclear disaster.. Read more at; 
http://enenews.com/momentous-decision-mayors-refuse-meet-japan-officials-strongly-mistrust-government-kyodo (website deleted)

Censored, Top Secret! Art And Science Of Deception; Global Corporations, ALEC, TPP, CIA, Journalism And The 1%, Whistleblowers, Voting, Elections And Solutions
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/p/corporations-art-and-science-of.html

BBC, NEW YORK TIMES AND NRC ALL AGREE, THAT BUILDING NUMBER 3 EXPERIENCED A NUCLEAR TYPE OF EXPLOSION THAT SPREAD NUCLEAR FUEL FRAGMENTS FOR MILES AROUND THE PLANT


So let’s see what reality and evidence may bring to light. Wouldn't you agree that the public still deserves to know the truth of the matter. What really happened at #3 reactor building?

First, everyone agrees there was an initial explosion at Fukushima Daichi Unit #3 at 11:01 AM JST on March 14th. This explosion was seen by the whole world on television. Details were also recorded in the reactor log. The government was notified as they are required to, by law. 

The Japanese government was told about the release of nuclear fuel material, which “fell all over the plant site”. The only disagreement about this is how far the pieces of nuclear fuel from Reactor #3 were blown; 1 mile, 2 miles or 3 miles? (see links below) The New York Times, BBC and the NRC stated that #3 had a nuclear explosion and that it spread nuclear fuel fragments a mile around the plant, including into the Pacific ocean. http://vimeo.com/28222223

A BBC report also suggests that nuclear fuel fragments were tossed all around the site. Watch BBC Clip: US video suggests flakes of nuclear fuel were scattered around Fukushima reactors -- Secret plans to evacuate citizens from Japan (VIDEO) February 24, 2012 
http://enenews.com/video-suggested-flakes-deadly-radioactive-fuel-scattered-around-fukushima-reactors-secret-plans-evacuate-90000-citizens-japan (website deleted)

Via Jebus November 23, 2014 The Bomb Plant: A MOX White Elephant?
When Reactor Number Three at Fukushima exploded, it spewed plutonium from MOX fuel which had been loaded into the reactor the previous fall. Highly toxic plutonium particles were found as far away as 45 miles from the reactor site.
http://www.dcbureau.org/201110206421/national-security-news-service/the-bomb-plant-a-mox-white-elephant.html

Via Jebus November 23, 2014  Plutonium found in soil outside stricken Fukushima reactor
The presence of the highly radioactive element in the soil confirms damage to reactor number 3, where it was housed. JAPAN’S NUCLEAR AUTHORITIES have detected the presence of plutonium in the soil outside the troubled Fukushima I nuclear power plant. The findings – reported by Japan’s Kyodo news agency – would all but confirm that radioactive material has leaked from the plant, and from the number 3 reactor in particular.

EVIDENCE; WHAT CAUSED THIS BLACK/PINK SMOKE NUCLEAR BOMB LOOKING EXPLOSION? HYDROGEN EXPLOSIONS ARE WHITE SMOKE ONLY

News report and pictures of black smoke coming from Unit 3
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/nEncjYf2jJQ 1 min

Bill D November 10, 2014 "The MOX fueled FDU-3 reactor explosion, produced: orange flame, implosion, supersonic detonation, black smoke, hyperthermic fuel vaporization and scattering as well as induced Gamma (Γ) radiation in structural metals. These signs and symptoms characterize neither hydrogen nor steam explosions. The Japan FDU-3 March 14, 2011 detonation was therefore a prompt criticality, also known as an atomic explosion or nuclear blast. That telltale atomic mushroom cloud is a bonus point.

Via Lee Bowen "A high ranking Japanese nuclear inspector “The amount of cooling water decreased in the Reactor 3 SFP prior to the explosion- Hydrogen was generated from the zircaloy-water reaction- The upper part of the cladding melted, and the pellets fell out and piled (at the bottom of the pool?)- Inside the SFP, it was like a nuclear reactor becoming critical, and the water boiled- Then there was a hydrogen explosion above the surface of the water in the SFP- Due to the pressure from the explosion, voids (steam bubbles) in the boiling water were compressed- The void coefficient was negative, so the reactivity of nuclear fission was suddenly heightened- Resulting in a nuclear explosion from the prompt criticality- When you see the slow-motion video of Reactor 3′s explosion, you hear three explosive sounds- It is the evidence that the nuclear explosion occurred after the hydrogen explosion- MOX fuel rods explode in experiments when quick intense heat is applied."

The nuclear fuel fragments from #3 flew out two miles and a few reports such as the one above report that they went out 3 miles or more. Of course the gases and nano hot particles went all around the world. 

This first point totally refutes the official TEPCO for public consumption press release, where they still claim to this day that there was no fuel release, no reactor damage and no nuclear explosion, just a hydrogen explosion at #3. Who do you believe? 

How will the fuel scattered on the ocean bottom affect the ocean for the next 1 million years? How much radiation will contaminate how much ocean, as the ocean circulates water over this several square miles of scattered nuclear fuel debris?

The #3 reactor building explosion was VERY different from the other kinds of hydrogen triggered explosions in the other buildings. When #3 exploded, it triggered the evacuation of the whole complex. 

Many more people were injured and/or killed with this #3 explosion, even though TEPCO denies any deaths happened as well. TEPCO decided to abandon the plant shortly after the Building #3 explosion. However, based on an order from someone high up in government, a small crew of 50 returned to try and save the plant.

NEW YORK TIMES: PIECES OF MOX FUEL RODS FOUND OUTSIDE REACTOR NUMBER TWO, BUT WERE THEN COVERED UP BY BULLDOZERS


New York Times: Broken pieces of nuclear fuel rods found outside Reactor No. 2, says nuke executive -- Covered up by bulldozers April 7, 2011 

Whether or not the power was maintained to instruments, gauages and recording equipment is in dispute. TEPCO claims it never lost power, but other reports say that power was completely out for many days, and there was no way TEPCO could know anything about any reactors for a certain period of time, due to loss of ALL power to the whole complex.

WHAT WAS DUMPED IN AND CEMENTED WEST OF REACTOR #1?

JANUARY 11, 2017 A GREEN ROAD DAILY NEWS
Fukushima 311 Watchdogs
1479135_10202845215594748_1791438227_n.jpg

Citizen scientists at work! This is what we can all do to ensure the truth remains clear, in spite of the barrage of corporate propaganda. Thanks Ray Masalas

Ray Masalas found this early picture in his files {May 8th 2011 still a road west of reactor #1} and of course the later {Late July 2011} below picture showing the huge concrete pour west of reactor #1.

You can guess what got dumped in there and cemented over? No wonder the aquifer is hot. Anyway, at least we have a timeline on the mysterious boat shaped, concrete pour. By Aug. 2011 it became covered with sand and they pretended they were just regrading the road.

Ray Masalas guesses the blob from the north wall of reactor #4 and a pile of blown out fuel rod chunks went in there. He really wishes he had a picture of how deep they dug…
View original post 143 more words

TOWERS ARE 700 FEET TALL, BLACK NUCLEAR MUSHROOM CLOUD RISES WAY ABOVE THOSE TOWERS


The explosion at Unit #3 was HUGE. The vent tower behind #3 was 700 feet tall. When Unit #3 exploded, its contents of MOX fuel went up into a gigantic plutonium laced mushroom nuclear radiation filled cloud. When Unit #3 exploded the mushroom cloud went up so high that it made the tower look like a tiny flea on an elephant. The contents of #3 went all the way up into the stratosphere and jet stream, where it was carried across the Pacific to the USA and then around the world. 

FUEL FRAGMENTS FOUND OVER A MILE AWAY WERE EJECTED FROM THE REACTOR CORES AND NOT FROM THE SPENT FUEL POOLS


Report: Nuclear fuel fragments found over a mile away were "ejected from the reactor cores in those explosions" not spent fuel pools, according to NRC (VIDEO) August 18, 2011 
http://enenews.com/report-nuclear-fuel-fragments-found-mile-away-ejected-reactor-cores-explosions-according-nrc-video (website deleted)

Paul Gunter, director of Reactor Oversight Project with Beyond Nuclear: We were involved in an Nuclear Regulatory Commission [NRC] hearing on July 28 of this year where the NRC basically admitted that fuel fragments found over one and a half miles away from the facility did not come from explosions from the spent fuel pools, according to the NRC those fuel fragments were ejected from the reactor cores in those explosions.

The #3 explosion was unlike the horizontal, low to the ground, white smoke hydrogen explosions in the other units that exploded at this complex. When Unit #3 exploded, it also carried a huge amount of radiation filled debris along with it, while also spreading pieces of nuclear fuel rods around the plant anywhere from 1-3 square miles. (See analysis links below)

Nuclear engineer: NRC now says reactors and containments have breached and released plutonium off-site -- "Much worse" than if from spent fuel pools (VIDEO) August 22, 2011 

Assuming that the plutonium/uranium nuclear fuel was scattered in a 1 to 3 mile radius from the blast zone, then approximately 4 to 7 square miles around the Fukushima plant were highly contaminated with fragments of nuclear fuel, including parts of the ocean floor. (Maybe this is at least part of the reason why the radiation readings offshore in the ocean are not going down as expected?) 

Mag: Curium and plutonium outside Fukushima plant indicate nuclear explosion at Reactor No. 3 -- Broken spent nuclear fuel rods may have been scattered December 17, 2011 

Another fact that the pro nuclear folks like to cover up or deny is that Fukushima Reactor #3 was loaded with MOX plutonium rich fuel. According to nuclear expert Arnie Gunderson, #3 was an old, poorly designed Mark I reactor design. He says that TEPCO may very well have pushed it too far by loading highly unsafe and very dangerous plutonium containing fuel, which it was NOT designed for. This load of MOX fuel was an ‘experiment’ to see if they could ‘safely’ do this with Mark I reactors. These reactors are all over the world, including 21 of this same type of reactor in the United States.

The nuclear industry is trying to switch ALL nuclear reactors to burn plutonium instead of uranium, but plutonium is much more unstable, unsafe and orders of magnitude more toxic and deadly to all life, due to being a heavy metal poison and highly radioactive on top of that.

# 3 BUILDING EXPLOSION ALONE RELEASED 50 - 100 TONS OF URANIUM/PLUTONIUM


This Mark I Unit #3 reactor melted down 9 months after it was loaded with MOX fuel. When it exploded, it released up to an estimated 500 pounds of plutonium nano particle sized dust into the air, plus an estimated 20 to 100 or more tons of nano particle sized uranium dust, just from this building alone. The total amount depends on what exploded; was it the spent fuel pool, the reactor, or both? This may very well be why the company and Japanese government as well as nuclear regulators pushed so quickly for ‘cold shutdown’ and why no ‘official’ press releases from the company include any mentions of plutonium, nuclear explosion, uranium, or anything else that may sound scary.

NYTimes flashback: Broken pieces of nuclear fuel rods found outside Reactor No. 2, says nuke executive -- Covered up by bulldozers   February 25, 2012 

No one in the nuclear industry wants anyone to know that both highly toxic and dangerous plutonium was released from this explosion, and that may very well be why you will not see this on any GE controlled mass media outlet or even on Wikipedia, which to this day, still claims the ridiculous assertion by ‘experts’ that Fukushima only released 10% of Chernobyl radiation. (The pro nuclear companies own or control most news companies via advertising budgets and influence.)

The nuclear industry has a lot of ‘experts’ hired on to refute any non-experts logic, like that above and to sweep the web of any 'facts' or information to contrary, such as the wiki entry. They can go in and switch any truth offered and return it to the nuclear industry lies, because they hire enough people to make it happen, compared to ordinary citizens, who may not even know how to modify a wiki entry or have zero chance of getting on TV.) 

How can a nuclear explosion and multiple spent fuel pools plus multiple melted down reactors only manage to release 10% of what Chernobyl released? Even an average person can see through this obvious, outrageous fabrication and deception.. 

How can we allow a corporation that makes nuclear reactors and nuclear devices and sells them, to also own all of our news outlets and to staff the regulator that is supposed to ensure public safety with a revolving door, just like the FDA and drug companies? Is this not an example of very unsafe conflict of public and community interest? Now let’s turn our attention to what happened at the spent fuel pool at Unit #3. 

ESTIMATE OF AMOUNT OF PLUTONIUM RELEASED BY CRITICALITY EXPLOSION AT UNIT #3


The weight of a uranium nuclear fuel pellet is 7 grams but I will make it even easier as math is no longer the strong suite of humanity: Reactor #3 had approximately 548 assemblies (not rods; assemblies) in the reactor core and another 514 assemblies in the spent fuel pool (SFP) directly above the reactor (Another GE dangerous design flaw of the Mark I). Just in spent fuel alone there was some 90 tons of it in total in the SFP. That pool was obliterated in the explosion.
90 x 2000 (1 ton = 2000 lbs.)= 180,000 lbs. Using whole numbers for easier grasping; 7% of 100,000 is?
7 =7% of 100
70 =7% of 1000
700 =7% of 10,000
7000 =7% of 100,000
Just so there are no ‘idiots’ to question the obvious math; so more than 7000 lbs. of plutonium was released into both the atmosphere and Pacific Ocean when Fukushima unit #3 blew up.

SPENT FUEL POOL FUKUSHIMA DAICHI #3 ANALYSIS

First, let us look at SFP #3, which contained plutonium MOX fuel. Many experts claim that #3 spent fuel pool had no MOX fuel in it, and many of those same experts also claim that this spent fuel pool was not damaged in the explosion at Unit #3. TEPCO has put out a video that claimed the pool is full of water, and it appears that little or no damage was done to the fuel rods. They also say nothing happened to the #3 reactor. This video and their press releases give the impression that nothing happened to reactor #3 and little or nothing of interest happened at the #3 spent fuel pool, despite it getting no cooling water for a long period of time after the 3/11 mega nuclear disaster. 

“Tokyo Electric Power Co., Inc. Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 3 According to the results confirm the soundness of the new MOX fuel in the long-term storage” July 31, 2010 NISA - Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency

Introduction: Analysis of this document began under the premise that MOX fuel could in no possible terms be viable and intact after spending a period of 10-11 years in the spent fuel pool. Documents show that 32 Mixed Oxide Fuel Assemblies were manufactured and sent to Fukushima-I in 1999. These fuel assemblies were then stored in the Spent Fuel Pool of Reactor 3 pending local government approval. This approval did not come until late summer of 2010, at which point arrangements were made and the fuel assemblies were loaded into Fukushima I-3 in September 2010.” 



What have we learned so far? The experts claiming that the #3 spent fuel pool never contained MOX fuel lied.  According to the above documentation, #3 spent fuel pool and the reactor at #3, DID CONTAIN MOX FUEL. Remember that nuclear fuel only lasts about a year, and it is then removed and put into the spent fuel pool to cool off for between 5 to 7 years. Both the #3 reactor and the spent fuel pool contained MOX fuel. 

Next, let's determine if the fuel in the #3 pool was damaged or melted, since TEPCO and many nuclear experts claim that nothing happened in this pool, and some claim that all of the rest of the spent fuel pools in all of the other buildings are perfectly OK as well. They even released an ‘official’ video claiming to show that the pool is intact and full of water, filled with perfectly intact spent fuel rods. This is a TEPCO provided video of Reactor Unit 3 spent fuel pool at Fukushima Daiichi 8 May 2011 http://youtu.be/KugIrnThul0 (TEPCO claims this is a video of an intact spent fuel pool #3)

WHAT HAPPENED TO SPENT FUEL POOL #3 AND THE EQUIPMENT POOL?


Could it really be that #3 spent fuel pool sustained almost no damage and is still full of water, with a full load of undamaged spent fuel inside of it? 

“New TEPCO data measured on August 19 and 20, 2011 shows severe damage to the spent fuel in Fukushima Daiichi Units 1, 2, and 3. The adjacent TEPCO table posted on the front page shows incredibly high levels of Cesium 137 and Cesium 134 in all three spent fuel pools of Units 1, 2, 3. 

This TEPCO data clearly contradicts and refutes the July 2011 assertion by the NRC the Fukushima Daiichi spent fuel pools were not damaged in this tragic accident. Crytome has a new high resolution photo, also uploaded, that shows the extensive damage of the Unit 3 spent fuel pool and the reactor building.” 

Then there is this report showing high levels of iodine being produced from spent fuel pool #3. This indicates an active fission process, and melted fuel. This sets the stage for the next Highest Yet: Iodine-131 in #3 spent fuel pool at over 1,000,000 times normal — “Generated during nuclear fission” (VIDEO) May 10, 2011 
http://enenews.com/iodine-131-3-spent-fuel-pool-1000000-times-normal-suggests-nuclear-chain-reaction-nuclear-expert-video (website deleted)

TEPCO RECORDING SEPT. 2011, SHOWS MELTING FUEL ROD ON VIDEO

Via Heart of the Rose August 27, 2014 nuckelchen-edition of Inside of Unit 3 Reactor at Fukushima
Sept 14 2012 "The lonesome fuel-rod

"Investigation of the Inside of the Spent Fuel Pool for Fuel Removal from the Upper Part of Unit 3 Reactor Building at Fukushima
"
tepco record was taken 13th september 2011!!!!!!
Thanks for video n for music… goes well with strange solitary fired-rod.
Thank You all for watching
Namaste Aloha Blessings..wishing relax weekend to everyOne… Peace Time"

Flyover of building 3 shows evidence of single highly radioactive fuel rod sticking up out of wreckage
The above video is one single fuel bundle sticking up out of the wreckage of spent fuel pool #3, and the colors are not added later; they are the fuel rods 'burning' or forming a kind of colored plasma in air. Remember that radiation, toxic heavy metal gases and nano particles coming off these burning fuel rods are all INVISIBLE. There is no smoke, no fumes you can smell and nothing you can taste.

AFTER THE EXPLOSION


Heart of the RoseAugust 6, 2015 But where's the missing bundles?


July 3 2011 Video of damaged spent fuel pool No. 3 reveals single bundle of fuel that is very near water surface — “There should be a lot of bundles” (VIDEO)
http://enenews.com/video-damaged-spent-fuel-pool-3-reveals-only-single-bundle-fuel-very-water-surface-be-lot-bundles-video (website deleted)

At the very least, there is direct evidence provided by the company itself, that the #3 spent fuel pool was AT THE VERY LEAST EXTENSIVELY DAMAGED, and that at least some of the spent fuel in #3 SFP melted. Uncontrolled nuclear fission was happening, (producing radioactive iodine). This fission can only happen if spent fuel is melted down and reacting down inside the pool. 

So now let's continue on with our detective work, since the nuclear regulators seem to be unable to even accomplish this. Remember that the IAEA visited the plant, along with the NRC representatives and found nothing amiss. The IAEA is still officially reporting no nuclear explosion, no plutonium released, and only 10% of Chernobyl radiation released. The evidence presented so far does not match this claim. 

Now let's ask a scary question. Is it possible that the #3 spent fuel pool lost all or most of its contents, which were were blown sky high in the massive mushroom cloud explosion that everyone saw? Some reports and a few experts indicate that this is the case.

According to a “US nuke industry report, explosions at Fukushima Units 1, 3, 4 may have caused inventory (nuclear rods) to be lost from spent fuel pools -- "Debris" on ground near Unit 3 was extremely radioactive after blast” November 11, 2011 

Lets have a few more experts weigh in, shall we? One Japanese Expert said; “It was a nuclear explosion at Reactor No. 3 — I believe fuel rods were blown out of spent fuel pool.” 
Source/credit Close up of fuel rods sticking out of Fukushima Building 3 by Troy Livingston

NUCLEAR EXPERT SETSUO FUJIWARA SAYS EXPLOSION AT #3 WAS A NUCLEAR EXPLOSION


The link above consists of a story with Japan nuclear expert Setsuo Fujiwara, who did an interview with SPA magazine. He worked at the Japan Nuclear Energy Safety Organization (JNES). He was a nuclear plant inspector and he knows these plants inside out, backwards and forwards. He also claims, as other experts do, that the explosion at reactor #3 was a nuclear explosion. 

He described the flicker of fire and the vertical black smoke rising up. But he goes on to say that the spent fuel pool at #3 was destroyed and the contents of the pool were dispersed by the explosion. Specifically he asserts that there was an explosion INSIDE the #3 spent fuel pool and the melted or whole fuel rods inside of it were blown out. These pictures are the evidence of that.




Credit/source; Building #3, what is left of it, steaming and smoking, by Troy Livingston

Fukushima Reactor#3 steaming away with MOX Plutonium fuel rods exposed to atmosphere picture from 2011

Reactor#3 Nov 8,2011 drone fly over
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=10152115140683245&comment_id=31269969&offset=0&total_comments=3&notif_t=video_comment
He explains the sequences of events by saying that the water level decreased in the spent fuel pool #3, which caused fuel rods to melt down. Hydrogen gas was produced from the zircaloy water reaction. Inside the spent fuel pool (SFP), the water boiled above the melted fuel, and at some point, a hydrogen explosion happened. 

He describes that the hydrogen explosion caused the water to compress downwards, which also compressed the hydrogen bubbles in the boiling water. This created a negative void coefficient so the “reactivity of nuclear fission was suddenly heightened. This resulted in a nuclear explosion of prompt criticality.” 

“Nuclear expert: Powerful explosion at reactor No. 3 may have been from "prompt criticality" in spent fuel pool” (VIDEO) April 26 

NUCLEAR INDUSTRY INSIDER ARNIE GUNDERSON, ANOTHER NUCLEAR EXPERT ALSO AGREES THAT BUILDING 3 WAS NOT A HYDROGEN EXPLOSION, BUT A DEFLAGRATION


Arnie Gunderson goes into the explanation about what caused the devastation everyone sees at Unit 3. He explains the difference between a detonation and a deflagration. He reports that there is a huge difference between the explosion at #3, and the hydrogen explosions at the other buildings. He reports that nuclear fuel rods were found as far away as TWO MILES from Unit #3 and they came from Building #3. 

Uranium, plutonium and americium has been found around the world as a fine dust. He says that the only way this can happen is if nuclear reaction happened, and that this fuel was volatized and thrown out. He says that the fuel pool exploded, and it accounts for the muzzle shaped explosion. He says the rubble coming back down were fuel racks, fuel rods and debris from the building. The blackness of the cloud were evidence that uranium and plutonium were volatized and turned into dust that traveled all around the world.

He continued by saying; If it were just hydrogen, the explosion would just be under the speed of sound, but the #3 explosion was faster than the speed of sound. A detonation does not cause a flash of red, but a deflagration does. He says that a hydrogen explosion happened, which caused a distortion in the pool, which caused the prompt critical explosion. There is a way to test this hypothesis, and that is to test the smoke. There are two xenon isotopes and depending on their relationship, we can determine if this was a prompt criticality or not, but no one has released this information yet. (end of video) 

Update; Arnie later on changed his mind and said the same reaction happened as he explained above, but he now believes the large MOX fuel containing plume came from the nuclear reactor, which makes it even worse, in his opinion.

NUCLEAR EXPLOSION CRITICALITY AT #3 ACCORDING TO DR. CHRIS BUSBY


Another nuclear expert; Dr. Christopher Busby weighs in and says that the #3 explosion may have been a nuclear explosion criticality. FIRST PROMPT CRITICALITY NUCLEAR EXPLOSION At #3.

His Analysis of #3 Explosion is detailed in this video;

FORMER TEPCO EMPLOYEE SAYS GOVERNMENT AND TEPCO ARE LYING; PLUTONIUM AND URANIUM IN #3 WERE ALL BLOWN OUT, NOT AN ORDINARY EXPLOSION


Even a former Tepco employee has reported that the government and TEPCO are lying about all of this. He says that “plutonium and uranium in Reactor No. 3 has all been blown out — This was no ordinary explosion — Gov’t is concealing truth” (VIDEO) November 12, 2011 
http://enenews.com/former-tepco-employee-plutonium-uranium-all-blown-reactor-3-ordinary-explosion-govt-concealing-truth-video (website deleted)

NUCLEAR REACTORS CAN AND DO EXPLODE, DESPITE PRO NUCLEAR APOLOGISTS CLAIMING THAT THIS IS NOT POSSIBLE


Some nuclear apologist ‘experts’ claim that there was no nuclear explosion at #3, because there was not enough concentration of enriched uranium/plutonium to support such a reaction. But the evidence of history supports the conclusion that it is possible, and that it has happened more than once in the past, in exactly the same way that it happened here at Fukushima. See ‘Prompt Criticality: Capable of sustaining a chain reaction without the aid of delayed neutrons’. at-McGraw-Hill Science And Technology Dictionary link below. 

In their article they are quoted as saying that “nuclear reactors can be susceptible to prompt-criticality accidents if a large increase in k-effective (or reactivity) occurs, e.g., following failure of their control and safety systems. The rapid uncontrollable increase in reactor power in prompt-critical conditions is likely to irreparably damage the reactor and in extreme cases, may breach the containment of the reactor.

Nuclear reactors' safety systems are designed to prevent prompt criticality and, for defence-in-depth, reactor structures also provide multiple layers of containment as a precaution against any accidental releases of radioactive fission products. With the exception of research and experimental reactors, only a small number of reactor accidents are thought to have achieved prompt criticality, for example Chernobyl #4, the U.S. Army's SL-1, and Soviet submarine K-431. In all these examples the uncontrolled surge in power was sufficient to cause an explosion that destroyed each reactor and released radioactive fission products into the atmosphere.” Read more: http://www.answers.com/topic/prompt-critical#ixzz1nasr9yRO

THERE HAVE BEEN AT LEAST 70 NUCLEAR REACTOR MELTDOWNS, EXPLOSIONS, FAILURES GLOBALLY, NOT JUST THREE AS THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY CLAIMS


List Of All 70+ Global Nuclear Reactor Melt Downs; via @AGreenRoad
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/04/list-of-all-27-global-nuclear-reactor.html

Multiple Nuclear Reactors Bombed; All Reactors ARE Nuclear Bombs; via A Green Road
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/04/multiple-nuclear-reactors-bombed-all.html

Now we have multiple nuclear experts, all in agreement that nuclear reactors can and do blow up. What we call these uncontrolled destructions of nuclear reactors is a small detail. 

All of the above experts are saying a non hydrogen explosion happened at spent fuel pool #3 and that massive amount of MOX fuel dust was spread all over the planet and fuel pellet fragments flew into surrounding areas.

AT LEAST TWO SEPARATE EXPLOSIONS HAPPENED AT BUILDING #3, POSSIBLY THREE


TEPCO claims that the only thing that happened at building #3, was one hydrogen explosion, but actually there were two separate MOX fuel explosions. 

Nuclear expert: Powerful explosion at reactor No. 3 may have been from "prompt criticality" in spent fuel pool (VIDEO) April 23 2011 

Japan Expert: It was a nuclear explosion at Reactor No. 3 — I believe fuel rods were blown out of spent fuel pool December 13, 2011 

UN agency’s report of 2nd explosion at Reactor 3 must have been made after consulting with RSMC Tokyo: EX-SKF

Worker at Reactor No. 3 says nuclear fuel gone from Spent Fuel Pool — “Great skepticism” that any pellets remain (VIDEO)

NYTimes on "Ejection of Nuclear Material": Confidential US doc suggests pieces of fuel blown up to a mile away -- Some between two units bulldozed over April 6, 2011 

Two explosions may have occurred early on at Reactor No. 3, very similar to Chernobyl -- Likely at least several hundred pounds of plutonium ejected (VIDEO) June 3 2011 

2 massive nuclear criticality explosions at building #3 were not only possible, but happened. Is here more evidence that there were two or three explosions? Each explosion was accompanied by a huge gamma ray burst. A gamma ray burst cannot happen with just a plain old hydrogen explosion.

We started this detective journey by asking if a nuclear explosion was possible. We found out that it was not only possible, but that the explosion actually consisted of at least two and quite possibly three separate explosions, one feeding and causing another and then another, in quick succession. 

Now we have two or three explosions to deal with and explain. First, we have a hydrogen explosion at one of the spent fuel pools, and then we have a nuclear explosion (deflagration/prompt criticality) coming out of one of the spent fuel pools. Remember that there are two pools, and the reactor, and each one of them contains fuel and can melt down and out or explode.  

The hydrogen explosion triggered the nuclear explosion(deflagration/prompt criticality) in the #3 reactor, in quick succession. Is there any evidence of three explosions happening at the #3 building, all at once?

A much deeper examination of this part of what happened at building number 3 is available at;

Another Lie By TEPCO; Not 1 Hydrogen Explosion, But 2 Separate PLUTONIUM MOX Fuel Explosions At Fukushima Building#3
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/01/another-lie-by-tepco-not-1-hydrogen.html

The above link goes into great detail and also explains how radioactive iodine is still being found years after the 3/11 mega disaster, indicating there is still ongoing fission happening at Fukushima.

Starting at 20 minutes in, an interview with a nuclear expert on Coast To Coast explains how two explosions may have occurred early on at Reactor No. 3, very similar to Chernobyl -- Likely at least several hundred pounds of plutonium ejected. Most of it will circle the globe and settle out. It only takes one tiny particle of inhaled plutonium to cause cancer and possibly die eventually. 

 Just like in Chernobyl, there were two explosions within milliseconds. He describes Fukushima as a Level 8 event, way about Chernobyl Level 7. A Level 8 is Multiple Source Event, with leaks in multiple reactors, requiring international assistance and cooperation. This will easily be a 1 to 10 TRILLION Dollar disaster, if Japan does what it has to, in order to prevent a global catastrophe.

The reactors were worth 38 Billion each, before they melted down.. Multiply 40 Billion each times 54 reactors and that is the total cost so far, assuming they all stay shut down, but without any cleanup or compensation or lost income/taxes). The mass media is NOT covering this, ABC, NBC, CBS and others are avoiding any coverage of this event. (VIDEO) June 3rd, 2011.  Several hundred pounds of plutonium were ejected. 
http://enenews.com/explosions-occurred-early-3-reactor-very-similar-chernobyl-several-hundred-pounds-plutonium-ejected-video (website deleted)

NRC ADMITTED THAT FUEL FRAGMENTS WERE FOUND ONE AND A HALF MILES AWAY


Hartmann - Fukushima...is this the China Syndrome?, The Big Picture, August 18, 2011. In the following video, at 4:15 in, “Paul Gunter, director of Reactor Oversight Project with Beyond Nuclear: We were involved in an Nuclear Regulatory Commission [NRC] hearing on July 28 of this year where the NRC basically admitted that (radioactive) fuel fragments found over one and a half miles away from the facility did not come from explosions from the spent fuel pools, according to the NRC those fuel fragments were ejected from the reactor cores in those explosions.

Nuclear Fuel Fragments Found A Mile Away, According To NRC

Now we have evidence around both the reactor AND the spent fuel pool exploding and spreading highly radioactive fuel rods for over a mile around the plant, including into the ocean.

From another source that would lend more weight of evidence that a nuclear explosion happened, and that fuel got scattered more than mile away; “According to the reports by the Ministry of Education and Science, curium-242 (242Cm) has been detected at a location 3 kilometers from the plant, and plutonium-238 (238Pu) has been detected at a location 45 kilometers from the plant. [...]242Cm's half life is short (about 163 days), and the deposition of 238Pu around the plant is far greater than normal, leading the Ministry of Education and Science to conclude these were emitted from Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant. If that's the case, pieces of broken spent nuclear fuel rods may have been scattered around the plant, and it is extremely dangerous.” 
http://enenews.com/mag-curium-and-plutonium-outside-fukushima-plant-sign-of-nuclear-explosion-at-reactor-no-3-broken-spent-nuclear-fuel-rods-may-have-been-scattered-around/ (website deleted)

JIMSTONEFREELANCE.COM PICTURE OF CONTROL RODS AND OTHER PARTS OF REACTOR OUTSIDE OF BUILDING



FUKUSHIMA BUILDING 3, SHOWING DRY EQUIPMENT POOL AT TOP CENTER


Reactor 3, top north, dry equipment pool rectangle top centre with the reactor plug centre circle directly above the spent fuel pool that looks like there is still water inside. 
Google Maps updated the satellite photograph of Fukushima
http://ex-skf.blogspot.fr/2014/06/fukushima-i-npp-on-google-maps.html


Credit/source; Troy Livingston

Notice also all of the metal plates around the building, to shield the few workers that go near this place from the lethal levels of radiation in the soil around it.

#3 MELTED OUT; VIDEO SHOWS CORIUM FROM REACTOR THREE MELTING AND FLOWING DOWN INTO GROUND


Watch the following video and say what you see.. Does it show a fissure or hole in the ground, next to reactor #3 with smoke coming out of it on 2/2012? This would line up perfectly with 100-150 tons of corium melted out of a building and contacting water in the ground, or fissioning underground and releasing smoke? (2:15 minutes in) Youtube deleted video.. thanks youtube.. 

The video at .28 in clearly shows red corium lava flowing out of the wreckage of the building #3, into the ground. Where did it come from is the only question left. Did it come from the reactor, or one of several spent fuel pools further up?
VIDEO: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbEgG2Rcy4g 1 min

Bottom line, at least one reactor, and/or one spent fuel pool melted down and out at building #3.

Radioactive Smoke/Steam Coming Out Of Ground And #3 Reactor Building At Fukushima, Rainbow Ion Spouts
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/02/tokyo-alert-severe-radioactive-smoke.html

BUILDING 3 PICTURES AFTER TOP OF IT WAS DEMOLISHED


Slideshow of pictures after top of building 3 demolished

Hi resolution photos of top of reactor 3 looking down 
http://enformable.com/2014/02/tepco-finds-falling-debris-damaged-shield-plug-fukushima-daiichi-unit-3/
Click on link above and then click on forward and backward buttons to see complete slideshow. Notice that a very thick concrete floor has been completely blasted through in multiple locations, and that the top of the reactor shield cap has also been partially pulverized and completely deformed. Notice the gap between the reactor top and the pool to the left, and the fact that the pool is empty, with no water in it.

Something very bad and very large happened here, but you will most likely never hear the truth from the nuclear industry. What kind of force would it take to create this kind of damage to very strong, thick and reinforced concrete, and to pulverize the rest of the building above it?

HOW MUCH PLUTONIUM WAS RELEASED FROM THE FUKUSHIMA MEGA NUCLEAR DISASTER?

How much radiation and how much plutonium was released when either #3 reactor and/or the #3 spent fuel pool and/or the equipment pool in #3 blew up and then melted down and out? No one knows, since the officials will not go there and none of the popular mass media radiation release figures include this. Most figures are still stuck on 10% of Chernobyl radiation total release, but this figure is laughable at this point. 

How would you feel, if someone tried to hide a nuclear accident that resulted in a release of 200-6000 pounds of plutonium dust, and an estimated 20 to 200 tons of uranium dust, just from building #3, and ignoring all of the other buildings and spent fuel pools? What if a potentially global life extinction event was also being covered up?

How Dangerous Is 400-600 Pounds Of Plutonium Nano Particle Dust Liberated By Fukushima?
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/03/how-dangerous-is-400-600-pounds-of.html

We all know that these out of control nuclear melt downs, explosions and melt through's released massive amounts of radioactive noble gases, many times more in total than Chernobyl. There is no way this could not have happened, since at least three reactors were confirmed to be leaking, melted down, melted through, and at least one spent fuel pool and possibly one reactor had a nuclear explosion, with many times the total tonnage of nuclear fuel, plus is was MOX fuel, which is many times more dangerous per ton than the equivalent Chernobyl radiation, which only had uranium releases. 

The three melted down corium blobs also release radioactive gases and dust, resulting in a bunch of radioactive isotopes that float out into the air. What is this total amount of nuclear fuel released? No one knows… TEPCO is not counting this and has no interest in finding out how really bad Fukushima is.  

TMI lost 20 tons of nuclear fuel into the air from ONE reactor core partially melting down for 1 day. Chernobyl lost 50 tons of uranium fuel in a huge explosion, and a raging out of control nuclear fire that burned for a long period, and then a melt out of a huge corium blob that was later found in the basements of the reactor building.  

COMPARING CHERNOBYL TO FUKUSHIMA 


The 50 tons of uranium that blew out of Chernobyl does not include the 500 tons of radioactive graphite that also was ejected and burned. There are 2,000 pounds in a ton, so 50 tons equals 100,000 pounds, which equals 10,000 nuclear bombs at 10 pounds of uranium each. Approximately 2,400 nuclear bombs have been tested in open air since the beginning of the atomic age.

Number of Deaths From 2,400 Global Nuclear Atmospheric Bomb Tests 1945-1998
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/04/nuclear-atmospheric-bomb-testing-1945.html

If Fukushima was 3 times worse, that means it would equal 30,000 nuclear bombs going off. 
If Fukushima was 10 times worse, that means it would equal 100,000 nuclear bombs going off. 
If Fukushima was 100 times worse, that means it would equal 1,000,000 nuclear bombs going off. 

Start with the total number of victims from 2,400 open air bomb tests, and multiply this by whatever you feel equals Fukushima as an equivalent, and it is easy to see how quickly the numbers of casualties add up.

MASS MEDIA IS NOT TALKING ABOUT LATENCY PERIOD, AFTER WHICH CANCER RATE REALLY ACCELERATES


How much worse do you believe Fukushima is, compared to Chernobyl? How many people will eventually die from cancers and other genetic diseases as the latency periods trigger? 

Latency Period For Cancer And How Potassium Iodide Use After Nuclear Disaster Prevents Thyroid Cancer, Plutonium Causes Many Kinds Of Cancers
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/10/how-potassium-iodide-use-after-nuclear.html

TEPCO LIES AROUND BUILDING NUMBER 4 EXPOSED


How much nuclear fuel has been vaporized and lost from multiple reactor cores over all of this time at Fukushima, in addition to the multiple FUKU spent fuel pools that blew up, melted down, or etc? Any guesses? Anyone with common sense knows that Fukushima lost orders of magnitude more fuel than Chernobyl, and much of it was MOX fuel, which makes it orders of magnitude worse than that. 

AGreenRoad - TEPCO/Fukushima Lies Exposed Building #4, SFP, Core. Equipment Pool, Melt Out
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/12/agreenroad-tepcofukushima-lies-exposed.html

Spent Fuel Pool #4 Allegedly Being 'Unloaded' By TEPCO Nov. 2013, The Coverup Continues
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/11/spent-fuel-pool-4-allegedly-being.html

The heavier elements melt DOWNWARDS, and the lighter radioactive elements go into the air as gases or hot particles, as proven by Chernobyl, TMI and other nuclear accidents. Just having something blow up does not mean everything disappears into thin air. At Fukushima, the ‘experts’ and nuclear apologists have to admit that do not know where the melted corium blobs are or what they are doing, much less how much radiation they are releasing into the air on a daily basis. 

Chernobyl blew up, and still had massive corium meltdown and melt out going down through multiple floors under the reactor, combined with massive amounts of sand, boron, lead and God knows what else. The corium at Chernobyl is all melted and fused together, and is congealed down under the reactor. 

Luckily, the Chernobyl corium was diluted with sand, boron and lead. It cooled on its way down. The corium stopped several floors down inside the building, in the basement. In Russia, they made HUGE efforts to stop that downward movement of corium by utilizing an army that consisted of over 500,000 people, and closer to 1,000,000 people.

ZERO EFFORT IN JAPAN TO FIND AND STOP THE CORIUMS


In Japan, there is almost ZERO effort to find or stop the multiple melted coriums from going down into the ground. They did not even admit it was happening, and then only slowly managed to admit that it was POSSIBLE that coriums melted down MONTHS later. Even now, they are having trouble even talking about it, much less investigating it or trying to figure out anything around it. They will not admit anything melted out of containment, and the farthest they will go is to say they don't know where the coriums are. They have zero interest in finding out.  

The danger is that there will be a massive explosion down the road which will take out the whole complex, thus causing a global life extinction event. The consequences of the nuclear corporate, regulatory body and government coverup/denial strategy may doom the human race. Time will tell. This is NOT over yet; it is just beginning.

IS MEGA NUCLEAR EXPLOSION POSSIBLE DUE TO MULTIPLE MOLTEN CORIUMS UNDER FUKUSHIMA?

At least one source says that a mega nuclear explosion is possible due to TEPCO ignoring this huge mega disaster and not even bothering to find and deal with the multiple melted out coriums. Things could get much worse, according to this source...

Shimatsu: Mega Nuclear Explosion Possible within Earth’s Crust Due to 3 Molten Coriums at Fukushima
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/01/shimatsu-mega-nuclear-explosion.html

Very little has changed since Chernobyl blew up and radiated everyone, except that many more nuclear accidents, meltdowns, melt throughs and ‘accidental’ radiation releases happened, plus way more radioactive substances are now in the air, on the ground and in the ocean as well as inside all of us.

How many radioactive elements and isotopes are released from something like Fukushima, some of which eventually end up inside everyone on the planet through concentration up the food chain, or by by being breathed in via gases or hot particles?

3000 KINDS OF POISONOUS HEAVY METAL AND RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS WERE RELEASED FROM FUKUSHIMA, BUT MASS MEDIA ONLY TALKS ABOUT ONE OR TWO OF THEM, WHILE IGNORING ALL OF THE REST


According to Asahi: about 1,000 kinds of radioactive materials have been released from Fukushima reactors. 

Let’s focus on just 93 out of the 1,000 total, shall we? There are 93 different long lived radioactive elements that hang around and pollute both the environment and us for at least 17,000 years and up to BILLIONS of years in total decay life. Want to see the list of all 93?

93 Long life Radiation Contaminants, A Problem For Billions Of Years
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/03/93-long-lived-nuclear-elements.html

The true horror of what happened at Fukushima has largely been ignored, covered up and denied. Pandora's Box was opened and it is still pouring poisons out, non stop. The problems will continue to get worse and worse is the prediction AGRP will make around this mega nuclear disaster, as they are not even dealing with reality here. 

 3,000 Lethal Radioactive Man Made Elements/ Nuclides Created By Nuclear Industry Are Coming Out Of All Reactors And Nuclear Accidents, Pandora's Box Opened
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2013/10/1946-lethal-radioactive-man-made.html

JAPAN GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATION INTO FUKUSHIMA RESULTS REPORTED ON BY ARNIE GUNDERSON


1 Hour Fukushima Report; "Apocalypse in Progress" Gundersen and Wasserman 2015
VIDEO: https://youtu.be/uimjWYYqg-0 50 min.

SUMMARY


How much sense does it make to heat water for only 30 years, when these insanely dangerous radioactive heavy metal poisons will affect millions of future generations in a negative way, and quite possibly cause the extinction of the entire human race plus all life on the planet?

The multiple broken open reactors at Fukushima continue to pour massive amounts of  up to 3,000 types of radioactive heavy metal poisons into the ocean, non stop, through broken open reactors that are all leaking through holes that no one seems to be able to fix.

The coriums more than likely left the reactors and are outside of containment in contact with groundwater, basement water and Pacific ocean water. No one seems to care. TEPCO is not even interested in figuring out where these multiple 100 ton lava blob fissioning poisonous coriums are that melted down and out of multiple reactors and spent fuel pools.

What happens when a Super Solar Storm hits and knocks out all power for months or maybe permanently?

Super Solar Storm To Hit Earth - 'Carrington Effect'; 400 Nuke Plants Will Melt Down/Explode

The potential life extinction question scientists should be asking is; what happens when all 400 nuclear power plants around the world no longer have power for weeks or months, just like Fukushima? 

Humanity has been warned via the Fukushima mega nuclear disaster, but the lessons are being ignored, denied, covered up and/or suppressed. It is going get much darker before humanity learns the lesson that nuclear power and nuclear weapons should have no place on Earth. 

There is no 'hiding' the deadly genetic mutating effects of cumulative radiation exposure. Slowly but surely, the Pacific is being poisoned to death by what is coming out of Fukushima, due to the never ending horrors of multiple 50 - 100 ton corium lava blobs there.

Pacific Ocean Catastrophe Confirmed, Fukushima Mega Nuclear Disaster Causing Massive Die Offs
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2012/04/fukushima-pacific-ocean-catastrophe.html

Fukushima Pacific Ocean Radiation And How It Concentrates In Mussels, Sea Stars, Chitons, Clams, Oysters, And Fish
http://agreenroad.blogspot.com/2014/01/fukushima-pacific-ocean-radiation-and.html

DONATE, SHARE, CONNECT, FOLLOW, COLLABORATE

Please help AGRP get this news out... thanks for your generous and very appreciated support! What you support grows and expands. What you withhold support from shrinks, shrivels and disappears. Even .50 cents per month is a great help. What is teaching the science of sustainable health worth?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1X Donation - Monthly Donation - AGRP Online - Pinterest Pics - Translate
AGRP Facebook Discussion Group - Facebook Daily News Page - Linkedin
Follow AGRP Daily News On Wordpress - AGRP Google Plus - Youtube
More ways; support A Green Road Project - AGRP Website - AGRP Tweets
A Green Road Eco Clothing/Products Store - AGRP Amazon Store
Get AGRP Delivered Daily To Your Email Address
Smartphone App - RSS Feed - Index
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Green Road Project; Teaching the Science of Sustainable Health. Keep asking - what works for 7 future generations without causing harm? Support AGRP and share this page; Twitter, Facebook, Email, Tumbler, Reddit, Stumbleupon, Google+, Wordpress and on Buffer

"Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, "ALLOWANCES ARE MADE FOR FAIR USE" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute, that otherwise might be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." For more info go to:www.lawcornel.edu/uscode. Copyright protected material on this website is used in accordance with 'Fair Use', for the purpose of study, review or critical analysis, and will be removed at the request of the copyright owner(s). Please read Notice and Procedure for Making Claims of Copyright Infringement.

END

What Really Happened At #3 Fukushima Reactor And Spent Fuel Pool #3? Multiple Nuclear Experts Interviewed; 3 Different Explosions, And Huge Black, Purple Mushroom Nuclear Explosion Cloud, Which Cannot Possibly Be A Hydrogen Explosion
https://www.agreenroadjournal.com/2016/04/what-really-happened-at-3-fukushima.html

Website and contact page


A Green Road Project - Science Of Sustainable Health Open Source Commons Knowledge Database
- Click in search box in upper right corner and type in search term to find any related article(s)


at